Pennsylvania General Insurance Company v. Disctronics, Inc., and Robert M. Jones Dale F. Rodesch

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DISCTRONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Robert M. Jones; Dale F. Rodesch, Defendants. No. 92-55142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1993. Decided Sept. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-90-6651-R; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: WOOD, Jr., * REINHARDT and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Disctronics, Inc., seeks reversal of a summary judgment which held Pennsylvania General Insurance Company had no duty to defend Disctronics in a separate lawsuit. For reasons stated below, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND 3 Dale F. Rodesch and Robert M. Jones (collectively referred to as "Rodesch") manufacture a video horse racing gambling machine. The machine uses laser discs to generate the audio and the visual…