Robert Ortiz v. Wayne Estelle Attorney General of the State of California

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne ESTELLE; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-56121. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 6, 1993. * Decided Aug. 18, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-91-0233-KN, David V. Kenyon, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and KELLY, ** Circuit Judges. 5 MEMORANDUM *** OVERVIEW 6 Robert Ortiz appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his state court conviction on multiple counts of rape and robbery. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. DISCUSSION 7 Ortiz argues that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at his suppression hearing because his attorney failed to investigate the whereabouts, and to secure the…