Michael A. Mikhail v. Railroad Retirement Board

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael A. MIKHAIL, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 92-70254. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 25, 1993. Appeal from the Railroad Retirement Board No. A-321-48-2781. R.R.B. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael A. Mikhail appeals pro se the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) affirming the appeals referee's decision that he was not entitled to disability benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (RRA), 45 U.S.C. Sec. 231a(a)(1)(v). Mikhail contends (1) there was not substantial evidence to support the RRB's conclusion that he was able to engage in regular employment within the meaning of the RRA, (2) the RRB relied on false medical reports when making its determination, and (3) the RRB improperly considered medical reports from his earlier application for…