Asatour Nagapetian v. United States

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Asatour NAGAPETIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-15433. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided Sept. 15, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Nevada, D.C. No. CV-91-00660-PMP; Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev., 935 F.2d 277 . AFFIRMED. Before: POOLE, FERGUSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Asatour Nagapetian, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion challenging his conviction on the ground that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Nagapetian contends that the district court erred by denying his motion without holding an evidentiary hearing on his claim. We have jurisdiction over Nagapetian's timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . 1 We affirm. 3 * We review de novo the district court's…