Pasutti v. Judicial Dept. of State of Or. By and Through Citizen Review Bd.

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary Louise PASUTTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT OF the STATE OF OREGON, acting By and Through the CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD, Defendant, and Nancy S. Asbury; Nancy Burket-Miller, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-35329. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. Decided Sept. 14, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of Oregon, No. CV-90-06517; John Jelderks, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Or. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and HALL, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 Mary Louise Pasutti appeals a decision granting summary judgment for defendants Nancy Burket-Miller and Nancy Asbury. 7 While Pasutti was employed as a coordinator for the Citizen Review Boards (CRB) operating in Lane County, Oregon, her supervisors instituted a policy that required all coordinators to notify a…