James L. O'COnnOr v. Francis I. Yamashita

Good Law
5 F.3d 538·1993 WL 321609·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 199393-15547California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James L. O'CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Francis I. YAMASHITA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15547. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 23, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James L. O'Connor appeals the dismissal of his amended complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). O'Connor sued Francis I. Yamashita, a Hawaii state court judge for, among other things: (1) ordering O'Connor to pay his landlord two months of rent in a dispute between his landlord and O'Connor, (2) always being assigned to hear O'Connor's several lawsuits, and (3) threatening, while in court, to find O'Connor guilty of malicious prosecution if he brought one more case against his landlord. The complaint stated that "this action is brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.