William Grant Odom v. Wayne Estelle, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Grant ODOM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne ESTELLE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-56154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 3, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Grant Odom, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his state conviction for possessing stolen weapons, possessing precursors with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine and endangering two children. We review de novo, Desire v. Attorney General of California, 969 F.2d 802, 804 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 Odom contends that the search of the residence where he was arrested violated the fourth amendment. A fourth amendment claim is not cognizable in a federal habeas proceeding where the state has…