Larry D. Nielsen v. Carol Pavilack Getty

Good Law
5 F.3d 538·1993 WL 339820·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30801
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 199392-17050California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry D. NIELSEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carol Pavilack GETTY, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-17050. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry D. Nielsen, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging the United States Parole Commission's decision imposing mental health aftercare as a condition of mandatory release. We review de novo, Vargas v. United States Parole Comm'n, 865 F.2d 191, 193 (9th Cir.1988), and affirm. 1 BACKGROUND 3 Nielsen was sentenced to a twenty-year term of incarceration following his guilty plea to kidnapping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 4205 (b)(2). At his initial parole hearing, the Commission ordered him to serve the full term less good-time deductions. The Commission ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.