Norman Lee Neilson v. Kern County, California Dudley Dunham William Thresher Rod Parker

5 F.3d 538 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norman Lee NEILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; Dudley Dunham; William Thresher; Rod Parker; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17084. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-91-00488-REC; Robert E. Coyle, Chief Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. VACATED AND REMANDED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Norman Lee Neilson appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment for defendants and dismissing his civil rights action. Neilson was convicted in a state court, following a jury trial, of violating certain zoning ordinances. In his complaint, Neilson alleged that the defendants violated his civil rights by: (1) misinterpreting the zoning ordinances; (2) illegally searching his property;…