Reddington Investments Inc. v. Security Pacific Corp.

Good Law
5 F.3d 539·1993 WL 321379·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30840
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 199392-55451California1,350 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. REDDINGTON INVESTMENTS INCORPORATED, a Texas corporation and a General Partner of Ruidoso Inn Limited Partnership; Bradley A. Near, a General Partner of Ruidoso Inn Limited Partnership; K. Alan Russell, a General Partner of Ruidoso Inn Limited Partnership; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SECURITY PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; Security Pacific Bank, A Delaware Corporation; Security Pacific Finance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Security Pacific Escrow Services, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation; Security Pacific Service Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Bim Gander; Mark Mashouri; Raymond Osgood; K.C. Mead, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55451. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. Decided Aug. 20, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, DC No. 86-1598-H (LP); M.D. Crocker,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.