In Re Evalyn Preblich, Debtor. Evalyn Preblich v. Kenneth W. Battley Dennis Sammut

Good Law
5 F.3d 539·1993 WL 321700·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 199392-36540California1,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Evalyn PREBLICH, Debtor. Evalyn PREBLICH, Appellant, v. Kenneth W. BATTLEY; Dennis Sammut, Appellees. No. 92-36540. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 24, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; No. CV-91-419-HRH, H. Russel Holland, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.Alaska AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 7 debtor Evalyn Preblich appeals pro se from the district court's affirmance of a bankruptcy court order authorizing the sale of certain bankruptcy estate property near Hope, Alaska to appellee Dennis Sammut by appellee-trustee Kenneth W. Battley. The district court held that because Preblich had failed to obtain a stay pending appeal, her challenge to the sale was moot under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363 (m). Preblich also petitions this court to stay the present appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.