Gregory Sanders v. William Bunnell, Superintendent

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory SANDERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William BUNNELL, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-56588. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-92-02695-RJK; Robert J. Kelleher, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal., 988 F.2d 121 . AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gregory Sanders, a California prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Sanders' petition as an abuse of the writ. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and review for an abuse of discretion. Neuschafer v. Whitley, 860 F.2d 1470, 1474 (9th Cir.1988); cert. denied, 493 U.S. 906 (1989). We affirm. 3 A petitioner may abuse the…