Reynard Allen Reynolds v. Oscar Contreras

Good Law
5 F.3d 539·1993 WL 340882·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30828
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 7, 199392-15195California974 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Reynard Allen REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Oscar CONTRERAS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15195. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. * Decided Sept. 7, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-89-00716-WDB, William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Ariz. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: D.W. NELSON and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge ** . 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Reynard Reynolds brought this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that police officers violated his constitutional rights during police interrogation by refusing him needed medical attention and by using coercive methods to obtain his confession. The district court granted the defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing Reynolds' case in its entirety. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Reynolds argues on appeal that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.