Jerardo Rodriguez v. Fred Pearce Frank Hall Manfred Maass

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jerardo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred PEARCE; Frank Hall; Manfred Maass, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Oregon, D.C. No. CV-91-6508-MRH(TMC); Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerardo Rodriguez, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's award of summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Rodriguez contends that while he was confined in the prison's disciplinary segregation unit (DSU), defendants Frank Hall, the director of the Oregon Department of Corrections, 1 and Manfred Maass, the prison superintendent, violated his constitutional rights by preventing him from purchasing…