R.S.

R.S. v. Berkeley Unified School District

Good Law
5 F.3d 539·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 199392-15164California264 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. R.S., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15164. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1993. Decided Sept. 16, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, D.C. No. CV-91-00598-MHP; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. 2 N.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: POOLE and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, Senior District Judge. * 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 R.S. appeals the summary judgment entered by the district court denying her attorney's fees pursuant to the All Handicapped Children Protection Act of 1986, 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1415 (e)(4)(B). R.S. contends that she is entitled to attorney's fees because she is a "prevailing party." 7 We have carefully reviewed the record and the district court's decision, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order of November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.