Rachel v. Santos v. Marvin T. Runyon

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rachel v. SANTOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-55211. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1993. Decided Sept. 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Central District of California, No. CV-89-6123-TJH; Terry J. Hatter, United States District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: GIBSON, * HALL, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 Memorandum ** 2 Rachel Santos appeals the district court's order finding that the United States Postal Service did not retaliate against Santos in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We affirm. I. FACTS 3 In June 1982, Santos was selected for a temporary promotion, not to exceed two years, as the Sequoia District Women's Program Coordinator, a level-17 position with the United States Postal Service. Santos reported to Arthur Montoya, the District Director of…