David R. Rawls v. Richard L. Fowler

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David R. RAWLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard L. FOWLER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16678. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Rawls appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of various federal officials and institutions in Rawls's consolidated action alleging that federal defendants illegally deprived Rawls of his mining claims. The district court determined that Rawls's consolidated action is barred by the res judicata and collateral estoppel effect of Rawls's prior actions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's determination that an action is barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, C.D. Anderson & Co. v. Lemos, 832 F.2d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.1987), and we…