Pioneer Lumber Treating, Inc., Pioneer Lumber & Treating Company of Kawaihae, Inc., and William Legg, and Mark R. Thomason v. Burr Cox, Wayne Deluz, Richard Root, Jefri Metheany, D.C., Benton Bolos, James Kelly, Samuel Wana, County of Hawaii, Guy Paul, William Schuman, Cindy Bell, Lon Tatum, Judith McKinney Lori Campbell, Mark Willman, Ralph Bateman, Robert Russell, Rodney Tamura, and Richard Betts, in Re Pioneer Lumber Treating, Inc., Debtor. Mark R. Thomason v. Wayne Deluz, Office of the United States Trustee, Benton Bolos, William Schuman, Richard Betts, Mark Willman, Lori Campbell, Creditors/appellees

Good Law
5 F.3d 539·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 199392-15236California5,072 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 539 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PIONEER LUMBER TREATING, INC., Pioneer Lumber & Treating Company of Kawaihae, Inc., and William Legg, Plaintiffs, and Mark R. Thomason, Appellant. v. Burr COX, Wayne Deluz, Richard Root, Jefri Metheany, D.C., Benton Bolos, James Kelly, Samuel Wana, County of Hawaii, Guy Paul, William Schuman, Cindy Bell, Lon Tatum, Judith McKinney, Lori Campbell, Mark Willman, Ralph Bateman, Robert Russell, Rodney Tamura, and Richard Betts, Defendants/Appellees. In re PIONEER LUMBER TREATING, INC., Debtor. Mark R. THOMASON, Appellant, v. Wayne DELUZ, Office of the United States Trustee, Benton Bolos, William Schuman, Richard Betts, Mark Willman, Lori Campbell, Creditors/Appellees. Nos. 92-15236, 92-15279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 18, 1993. * Decided Sept. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Hawaii, D.C. Nos. CV-89-00511-DAE, CV-91-00622-MP; Martin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.