United States v. Anthony Michael Barnes

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Michael BARNES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, No. CR-91-022-EJL; Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding. D.Idaho AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Michael Barnes appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for four counts of attempting to evade income taxes and two counts of willfully failing to file a tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Secs. 7201 , 7203. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Barnes' counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief which identified no meritorious issues for review. In Barnes' pro se supplemental brief, we discern two possible issues for review: (1)…