United States v. John David Anderson

Good Law
5 F.3d 540·1993 WL 358562·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30291
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 199392-10716California1,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John David ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10716. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 14, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CR-92-00034-LDG; Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before: REAVLEY, ** PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 John David Anderson appeals his jury conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). We affirm. A. Admission of Drug Evidence 3 Anderson argues that evidence of the drugs found on his person and of the drugs found in the apartment should have been excluded under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, "[w]e have repeatedly rejected such arguments. The prosecution is not restricted to proving in a vacuum the offense of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.