Truman Sylling, Formerly D/B/A Sylling Distributors v. Westinghouse Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Truman SYLLING, formerly d/b/a Sylling Distributors, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55167. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1993. * Decided Sept. 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, No. CV-90-0167-E; William B. Enright, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER ** , and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Sylling appeals the district court's dismissal of his antitrust action against Westinghouse and its subsidiary distributors for predatory pricing. His claims under Sec. 2 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 13 , the California Unfair Practices Act, Cal.Bus. & Prof.Code Sec. 17000 et seq., and for breach of contract, were dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief. We affirm. 3 A. Price…