Steiny & Company, Inc. v. Local Union 6, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. STEINY & COMPANY, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. LOCAL UNION 6, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-15201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 17, 1993. Decided Aug. 31, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CV-91-00155-DLJ, D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before LAY, * Senior Circuit Judge, HUG and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 An arbitration committee awarded back wages and benefits to Larry Farnum, a former employee of Steiny & Company (Steiny). Farnum was a member of Local 6, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Local 6). Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 (a), Steiny sought to vacate the arbitration award. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Local…