Betty Shively, Harold Shively v. United States

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Betty SHIVELY, Harold Shively, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16354. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 10, 1993. * Decided Aug. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CV-01109-EJG, Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harold Shively and his wife Betty Shively suffered serious injuries when their automobile struck a large Angus bull on California State Highway 44 in Lassen County, California. The land on either side of Highway 44 where the accident occurred is open meadowland. The Angus bull the Shivelys ran into was owned by a permittee under a grazing permit issued by the United States Forest Service. 3 The Shivelys brought suit against the United States, pursuant to the…