Sherwin Williams Company, an Ohio Corporation v. D.D. Investors, Inc., a California Corporation Donald Denne Bari Maxwell, Sherwin Williams Company, an Ohio Corporation v. D.D. Investors, Inc., a California Corporation, and Donald Denne Bari Maxwell

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.D. INVESTORS, INC., a California Corporation; Donald Denne; Bari Maxwell, Defendants-Appellants. SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.D. INVESTORS, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant, and Donald Denne; Bari Maxwell, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-55651, 92-55705. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. * Decided Aug. 18, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CV-89-5805-RSWL, Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and KELLY, ** Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 The district court was not clearly wrong in rejecting appellants' interpretation of the credit memo and the testimony of their "disinterested" witnesses. We may not reject the district court's view of the…