United States v. Darrell Lamont Bailey

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell Lamont BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 16, 1993. Decided Aug. 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; No. CR-90-00044-VRW, Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Bailey appeals from his judgment of conviction on three counts of armed robbery and related weapons offenses. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . Bailey's pro se notice of appeal is deemed timely even though he filed with the court of appeals instead of the district court. Brannan v. United States, 993 F.2d 709, 710 (9th Cir.1993). We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We…