United States v. Renee Alsept

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Renee ALSEPT, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-30476. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1993. Decided Sept. 13, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR-91-45-TSZ; Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding. 2 W.D.Wash. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BEEZER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and ARMSTRONG * , District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 The appellants challenge their convictions for failure to comply with the lawful direction of a Federal Protective Services (FPS) officer in violation of 41 C.F.R. Sec. 101-20.304. We affirm. 7 * When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, we reverse only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable…