United States v. Ramon Barraza-Martinez

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon BARRAZA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50091. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 3, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-92-00976-JMI; James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. DISMISSED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Barraza-Martinez appeals his 66-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and submitted a brief which identified one possible issue for our review: whether the sentence was disproportionate to the offense in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28…