Alejo Trejo-Santoscoy v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alejo TREJO-SANTOSCOY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70179. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 3, 1993. * Decided Sept. 13, 1993. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Acs-qix-xjr. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: TANG, CANBY AND BEEZER, CIRCUIT JUDGES. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alejo Trejo-Santoscoy petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge's decision ordering that he be deported. Trejo-Santoscoy contends that he was denied due process of law when the immigration judge ruled that Trejo-Santoscoy had abandoned his application for relief from deportation and therefore would not be permitted to pursue a waiver of deportation. 3 We deny the petition for review. DISCUSSION 4 Trejo-Santoscoy maintains that the deportation order was inappropriate…