United States v. Raymond Allweil

5 F.3d 540 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond ALLWEIL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 1993. Decided Sept. 22, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CR-91-0634-02-H; Marilyn L. Huff, District Court Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: KOZINSKI, SILER * and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant, Raymond Allweil, appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to commit bank robbery and aiding and abetting bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 , 371, and 2113(a). 3 Prior to trial, codefendant Rita Bennett entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to rob three banks on June 5, 1991 (Count I). In the written plea agreement, Bennett affirmed that "she is in fact guilty of conspiring with codefendant Raymond Allweil in robbing three separate…