United States v. Jerry Harris

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-16075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 13, 1993. Decided Sept. 8, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-91-0024-EDP; Edward Dean Price, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1 Before: REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Jerry Harris appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , arguing that the district court erred by not finding that the trial court committed constitutional error in the procedure it employed with regard to the cross-examination of a critical witness and, further, that appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel insofar as his appellate…