United States v. Charles Martin Bisbee

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Martin BISBEE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-10610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 2, 1993. * Decided Sept. 7, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of Arizona; No. CR-87-295-PHX-RGS, Roger G. Strand, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Before D.W. NELSON and NORRIS Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge ** . 3 Charles Bisbee ("Bisbee") pled guilty to one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 and one count of bankruptcy fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 152 . The district court imposed a prison sentence of two years on the mail fraud conviction followed by five years of supervised release, along with extensive restitution, pursuant to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Bisbee appeals from his conviction and sentence on the grounds that…