United States v. Jesus Antonio Flores

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Antonio FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesus Antonio Flores appeals his sentence, following a jury trial, for armed bank robbery and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a) and (d), 924(c)(1), respectively. Flores contends that the district court erred by denying a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3E1.1. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination that Flores did not accept responsibility. See United States v. Daly, 974 F.2d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam). 4 "If there is insufficient evidence to…