United States v. Tarhonne Michael Boyd

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tarhonne Michael BOYD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50528. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Aug. 31, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-0968-WDK, William D. Keller, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BURNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Tarhonne Michael Boyd appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Boyd claims the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence because his initial encounter with law enforcement officers constituted an unlawful seizure. Alternatively, he claims the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop. In either case, Boyd claims, his…