United States v. Anthony Del Guzzi

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony DEL GUZZI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. * Decided Sept. 2, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CR-85-379-AWT; A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, and BOGGS, ** Circuit Judges. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Del Guzzi, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order denying his motion to set aside his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We affirm. 7 An appellate court's review of the trial court's disposition of a motion to correct an allegedly illegal sentence under Rule 35(a) is narrowly limited to determining whether the sentence is within requisite legislative limits, and if so, whether its imposition was an abuse of discretion. United States v.…