United States v. Jesus Isais-Reyes, United States of America v. Ramon E. Higuera

Good Law
5 F.3d 541·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 199393-30029California709 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus ISAIS-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon E. HIGUERA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30029, 93-30030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Nos. CR-92-198-HJF, CR-92-198-02-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or., AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion appeals, codefendants Jesus Isais-Reyes and Ramon E. Higuera appeal their sentences under the United States Sentencing Guidelines imposed after they pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Appellants contend that the district court erred by declining to rule on whether they are entitled to a two-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.