United States of America, D v. Gary Carson

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, d Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary CARSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-37020. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 13, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CV-92-01142-REJ; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Carson appeals pro se the district court's denial of his petition to remove a state prosecution for a traffic violation from Carlton, Oregon Municipal Court to federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1443 . We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 1447(d). See Ferrari, Alravez, Olsen & Ottoboni v. Home Ins. Co., 940 F.2d 550, 553-55 (9th Cir.1991). We review de novo, see Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Newman & Holtzinger, P.C., 992 F.2d 932,…