United States v. Frank P. Guerrero
Opinion
Opinion
5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee, v. Frank P. GUERRERO, Petitioner-Appellant. No. 93-10143. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Guam, D.C. Nos. CR-75-00036-JSU, CR-75-00037-JSU; John S. Unpingco, District Judge, Presiding. D.Guam AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank P. Guerrero, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Guerrero alleges that the United States Parole Commission ("the Commission") improperly denied him parole because: (1) the record did not reflect that he was convicted of second degree murder as opposed to first degree murder; and (2) the Commission engaged in "double-counting" when they used the same action to justify a…