United States v. Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Manuel CARRILLO-RANGEL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-91-0310-TJH(A); Terry J. Hatter, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, RYMER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oscar Manuel Carrillo-Rangel appeals his conviction, which followed a jury trial, for using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). Carrillo-Rangel claims the evidence was insufficient to show he "used" the weapon within the meaning of the statute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if, viewing the evidence in the light most…