United States v. Louis Eugene Jackson

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis Eugene JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30062. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 11, 1993. * Decided Aug. 26, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; No. CR-91-413-HJF, Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Eugene Jackson appeals his sentence for bank robbery. Jackson claims that the district court erred in considering a 1987 state court conviction during sentencing, since the 1987 conviction was based on a guilty plea which was not knowing and voluntary as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 A defendant has a constitutional right to be "given the opportunity to collaterally attack prior convictions…