United States v. Coleman

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE:Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30436. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Oregon, D.C. No. CR-92-91-2-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick Coleman appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a) & (d) and use of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). Coleman contends that the district court erred by finding that he was not a minor or minimal participant in the offense of conviction because he drove a getaway car in only one of a series of three bank robberies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We…