United States v. Mark Daniel Ganley

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Daniel GANLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10646. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 30, 1993. * Decided Sept. 14, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-91-071-PHX-RCB; Robert C. Bloomfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before: REAVLEY, ** PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Mark Ganley was convicted of six counts of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 2113(a) and (d); one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 2113(a); and one count of use of a firearm in a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 924(c). The district court sentenced Ganley to 151 months for the robbery convictions, and imposed a consecutive 60-month for his use of a firearm.…