United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vildred Davis, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Vildred DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 92-50694, 92-50740. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 16, 1993. Decided Sept. 2, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CR-91-00821-TJH; Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. VACATED AND REMANDED. 1 Before: WOOD, * REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 We affirm Vildred Davis's convictions, but vacate and remand her sentence. 1 4 * To be a crime under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001 , a false statement must be made in a "matter within the jurisdiction of a[ ] department or agency of the United States." United States v. Oren, 893 F.2d 1057, 1064 (9th Cir.1990). Jurisdiction does not have a narrow or technical definition for the purposes of Sec. 1001. United States v.…