United States v. David Edwards

5 F.3d 541 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50131. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Southern District of California, D.C. No. CR-92-0444-01-RMB; Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding. S.D. Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Edwards appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to three counts of fraud relating to account access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1029 , sixty-one counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1341 , and fourteen counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1343 . Edwards contends that the district court erred in calculating the amount of loss caused by his fraudulent scheme. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and…