United States v. Alfred Leslie Lemmon

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred Leslie LEMMON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-91-362-1-FR; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding. D.Or., 804 F.Supp. 102 . AFFIRMED. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred Leslie Lemmon appeals his conviction, which followed a jury trial, for unlawfully making and transferring silencers and possessing an unregistered sawed-off shotgun in violation of 26 U.S.C. Secs. 5841 , 5861(d)-(f). Lemmon argues, first, that his prosecution was unconstitutional and, second, that the district court abused its discretion by allowing into evidence a pair of "auto sears," which could be used to convert legal semi-automatic weapons into illegal automatic…