United States v. Richard Kirschbaum

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard KIRSCHBAUM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10274. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CR-90-00114-01-AC; Alfredo C. Marquez, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Before: CHOY, GOODWIN, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Kirschbaum appeals from the district court's order directing the Special Master to disburse $60,524.06 in restitution and reimbursing the Master $1,291.62 for his expenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings. 3 The district court correctly concluded that under the terms of the plea agreement the deadline for submission of claims was six months after receipt…