United States v. Frank Masterana

Good Law
5 F.3d 542·1993 WL 337427·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 199393-10206California1,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank MASTERANA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 15, 1993. * Decided Sept. 1, 1993. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CR-85-00016-LDG (LRL); Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Nev. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and REAL, ** Chief District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Appellant Frank Masterana appeals an order of the district court revoking his probationary sentence under a failure to appear conviction and remanding him to custody for six months. Masterana contends that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation because his probationary service had already exceeded the statutory maximum of five years. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.