United States v. Michael Joseph Manus

Good Law
5 F.3d 542·1993 WL 356796·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30727
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 199392-10229California1,349 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Joseph MANUS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-10229. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1993. Decided Sept. 16, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Nevada, D.C. No. CR-91-00045-LDG(R); Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. Before: CHOY, SCHROEDER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The United States appeals the district court's grant of defendant Michael Joseph Manus' motion to suppress. We reverse. 3 * While on patrol, National Park Service Ranger Bradford Lammers saw Manus and his companion Shauna Lierly gathering rocks at a remote beach in the Lake Mead National Recreation Area. As Lammers approached the beach to tell Manus and Lierly that gathering rocks was prohibited, he saw their automobile and through the window…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.