United States v. Fred Jones, Jr., United States of America v. Roslyn Denise Harris

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred JONES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roslyn Denise HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-50715, 93-50000. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 7, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-92-00707-R, Manuel Real, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: TANG, CANBY and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion cases, Fred Jones, Jr., and Roslyn D. Harris pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 286 . Jones and Harris appeal the sentences imposed on them under the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm both sentences. 3 * Jones contends that the district court erred by increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.1(b), which provides…