United States v. Jimmy Neil Kinslow

Good Law
5 F.3d 542·1993 WL 346560·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 199392-56203California866 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy Neil KINSLOW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-56203. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1993. * Decided Sept. 10, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. Nos. CV-92-4810-R, CR-87-0639-R; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: FLETCHER, POOLE, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jimmy Neil Kinslow appeals pro se the denial of his fourth 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Kinslow was convicted of kidnapping and other crimes and sentenced to two consecutive terms of life imprisonment. He contends that he was improperly impeached at trial with a prior armed robbery conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and affirm. 3 Kinslow was convicted on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.