United States v. David Anthony McGee

Good Law
5 F.3d 542
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 199392-10405California1,418 words

Opinion

Opinion

5 F.3d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Anthony MCGEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10405. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1993. Decided Sept. 7, 1993. As Amended Nov. 5, 1993. Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nevada; No. CR-S-91-276-PMP (LRL), David Alan Ezra, District Judge, Presiding. D.Nev. AFFIRMED. Before: REINHARDT, TROTT and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 David Anthony McGee appeals from his conviction for one count of conspiracy to counterfeit obligations of the United States; one count of possession of counterfeit obligations in violation of 81 U.S.C. Sec. 472 ; and three counts of uttering counterfeit obligations in violation of that section. McGee also appeals the district court's decision to increase his offense level based on obstruction of justice. We affirm. 3 I. Motion for new trial based on newly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.